Hillary Clinton living in a deplorable glass house

First published September 11, 2016 in the Toronto Sun

Scripted Hillary Clinton veered off her highly-orchestrated 30-year course to become president.

Doing what she does best — taking money from Americans at a fundraising event in New York City — she slammed Republican Donald Trump’s supporters as “a basket of deplorables.”

“To just be grossly generalistic, you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Hillary preached.

Hillary claims that half of the nearly 14 million people who voted for Trump in the Republican primary — and those who support him now — are deplorable human beings. She didn’t stop there.

At the LGBT for Hillary fundraiser, she continued her screed against Trump supporters.

“Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that and he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric.”

In America, where free speech and thought are enshrined in the U.S. constitution under the first amendment, Hillary says that half of Trump’s supporters are racist and everything evil under the sun for supporting him. Yikes!

This heinous name calling sounds like a new horror show on cable: “Basketful of Deplorables.”

Hillary even punctuated her attack on Americans by saying that “some of those folks — they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”

The woman who used several private email servers and private emails, and deleted 30,000 emails as secretary of state to hide from accountability to the American people has now elevated herself to the stature of God. If you don’t support her, Hillary says you’re “an irredeemable, deplorable” American.

“How can she be president of our country when she has such contempt and disdain for so many great Americans?” Trump said in a statement.

What’s deplorable isn’t Americans who support Trump but the way Hillary conducts herself as a government official.

While secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation continued to take donations from foreign governments and businesses that had matters being reviewed by the state department. There were blurred lines between where the foundation ended and the state department began.

Hillary’s continued denials and stonewalling about not knowing that “c” stamped on government documents meant confidential is also deplorable. She wants to be the first woman elected president but, as secretary of state, treated classified information in a careless way. FBI Director James Comey said someone of her stature should have known better.

Then there’s Hillary’s unfortunate fainting spell Sunday while visiting the Ground Zero Memorial in New York City to honour the 15th anniversary of 9/11. After stonewalling the media for more than an hour, her campaign issued a statement saying “she felt overheated so departed to go to her daughter’s apartment.”

According to the NBC Pool Report, reporters were “told by the campaign that we are no longer allowed to shoot anything from the ceremony.”

Other press said that Hillary’s campaign staff blocked reporters from leaving the media area and refused to tell them what happened to her.

Once again, we see Hillary doing what she and Bill do best — covering up facts and obstructing laws. In this case, it was the freedom of the press to report news about her medical incident.

Hillary’s health has officially become an issue in the 2016 presidential campaign, along with her deplorable behaviour.

Trump Puts Black Vote in Play

First published September 5, 2016 in the Toronto Sun

Without question, Democrats have owned the black vote for more than a half-century, which is why they’re hysterical about Donald Trump’s latest move.

Daring to go where no Republican will, Trump spoke to a black church service in Detroit Saturday to compete for the black vote.

“I am hear today to listen to your message,” he told captive members of Great Faith Ministries International.

“I fully understand the African-American community suffers from discrimination.”

When Trump said this, the black vote officially became competitive. Adding that he was “here to learn and remedy injustice,” Trump demonstrated a natural ease in talking with blacks that his rival Hillary Clinton never does.

In his brief, scripted remarks, Trump expressed a sincerity and humility in offering blacks policies to address their problems and win their votes. While his outreach to black voters hasn’t been pitch perfect, this is a bold step in the right direction. Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney didn’t have the guts to do this. He spoke to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, not everyday black voters.

Trump also agreed to do a taped interview with the church’s Bishop Wayne T. Jackson. Because liberals feel threatened by Trump’s engagement with blacks, the New York Times tried to trash his campaign for receiving the questions in advance and preparing answers. Politicians do this all the time, as the Times noted: “It is not uncommon for a candidate to request interview questions in advance; aides to Hillary Clinton do it from time to time. But it is unusual for a campaign to go so far as to prepare a script for a candidate’s own responses.”

Hillary is one of the most scripted candidates to ever run for president, but according to liberal logic, Trump isn’t allowed to prepare for interviews.

Trump is asking blacks to vote for him and going to Democrat territory of black churches, no less. Every four years, Democrat candidates like Barack Obama and Hillary head to the churches to “get down” with blacks, win their votes with lies, then forget about them for four more years.

First liberals criticized Trump for asking blacks to vote for him at predominately white rallies. No liberals are mocking Trump and accusing him of pandering for the black vote now that he is walking into the lion’s den of Democrats’ monopoly on the black vote. Isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black?

When Trump arrived at the church, black protesters outside chanted: “What do you have to lose? Everything.” This was in reference to earlier remarks Trump made telling blacks they should consider voting for him after voting nearly 100% for the Democratic party for the past half century.


Sadly, these blacks have lost everything by voting for Democrats and should be protesting Hillary and her lies. Hillary is campaigning to end the mass incarceration of blacks. But in 1994 when she spoke in support of her husband’s crime bill, she called black male criminals super-predators who needed to be brought to heel like dogs.

Detroit, like most of America’s black inner cities, has been run by Democrats for decades and is mired in massive crime, poverty, incarceration rates and unemployment. If any party has been pandering to black people and not delivering, it is the Democrats. Each presidential election since Lyndon B. Johnson was elected in 1964, Democrats have campaigned to fix these problems plaguing blacks, yet they only exacerbate and perpetuate them.

After attending the church service, Trump visited black neighborhoods with Dr. Ben Carson. As a black Republican who criticizes the GOP for ignoring black voters, I hope Trump visits more black neighborhoods and exposes the “Con Job” Democrats have been playing on blacks for decades.



First published September 1, 2016 in Frontpage Magazine

Liberal Hollywood actors remind us all too often why they should stick to the mindless profession of being stars — rather than intellectuals. Rather than expressing fear and loathing for the two black men with guns who killed mother-of-four Nykea Aldridge, black actor Don Cheadle wished death upon Donald Trump.

“You are truly a POS. Sorry. I misspelled ‘die in a grease fire,’” Cheadle tweeted.

This was in response to Trump’s tweet:

“Dwayne Wade’s cousin was just shot and killed walking her baby in Chicago. Just what I have been saying. African-Americans will VOTE TRUMP!”

Days before Aldridge’s murder, Trump made direct appeals to black voters. At several campaign rallies, Trump reminded black voters that Democrats have done nothing to stop the black-on-black genocide in cities like Chicago, where Aldridge was mercilessly gunned down. Clearly, Trump was making the case for why blacks should vote for him. Chicago, like Detroit, Baltimore, Newark, New Orleans, St. Louis and so many other predominately black cities have been controlled by Democrats for decades and are cesspools of blacks killing each other. Consistently and historically, the Democrats, who control these cities, do nothing to solve the problem of violence. Trump is accurately pointing out the Con Job that Democrats are pulling on blacks — to their own peril.

But like Hillary Clinton, Democrats promise every election cycle that black lives matter to them. Democrats campaign to fix the same problems of violence, poverty, unemployment and low education rates that have plagued and ensnared these communities for the past half century. Nothing changes, as Trump said; so what do blacks have to lose in voting for him? Not much indeed.

After registering her kids for school, the mother-of-four was shot while pushing her newborn in the stroller. Two armed black felons, who were brothers, killed this 32-year-old mother. “Black mother of four killed by two black armed men,” declared the Liberal media … never.

Instead of wishing death to the two black thugs who killed Dwayne Wade’s cousin, the black Hollywood actor Cheadle excoriates Trump for his truthful tweet. Perhaps facts aren’t Cheadle’s thing, or he — like the mainstream media — isn’t bothered by the black deaths piling up in Chicago caused by blacks.

Derren Sorrells, 22, and Darwin Sorrells, 26, were convicted felons and really bad black guys. The Democrat-run city of Chicago managed by Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, screwed up! The day he and his brother killed Aldridge, Derren Sorrells had been released for a daily break from his electronic monitoring bracelet. Derren had a rap sheet of six felony arrests.

His brother Darwin Sorrells had been released early from a six-year prison sentence in January 2013 and was on parole for a gun charge. One would think that Cheadle would call these two black thugs the real “POS” — not Trump. Murders have increased by nearly 50% in mostly-black Chicago over last year. In fact, Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson attributes 85% of the gun violence in the city to gang members, not racist cops or Trump, as liberals like Cheadle would like everyone to believe. According to the Associated Press, July was a historically deadly month in Chicago, with 65 homicides committed, the most in that month since 2006.

Where is Cheadle’s Twitter rant of outrage at these senseless killings of blacks by blacks? Moreover, why isn’t #BlackLivesMatter trending on twitter over Aldridge’s death, or over the 450 murders that have taken place in Chicago to date? Cheadle and other liberals have manufactured outrage only for Republicans who dare offer solutions, or when a white, armed man kills a black person (which is rare in Chicago and most inner cities).

The sad reality is that Democrats will never address the problem driving black-on-black genocide in our inner cities. Nearly 75% of all black babies today are born out of wedlock to fatherless homes. I’ve spoken and written obsessively about this pathology. Until America reforms Welfare and enacts policies to encourage more marriage among blacks, none of this carnage will end. If you’re an unwed, uneducated teenage woman having a baby, the chances of your child growing up in poverty and turning to crime are over 50%.

While I grieve for Aldridge, it’s interesting to note that there’s no mention in any of the news coverage of her having a husband. Yet, she was the mother of four children; one of whom is an infant. Before blacks started voting solidly Democrat in 1964, most of the babies, about 77%, were born into married households. Something to think about.

Trump not wrong about Clinton being bigot

First published August 29, 2016 in the Toronto Sun

“Hillary Clinton is a bigot, who sees people of colour only as votes, not as human beings worthy of a better future,” Donald Trump observed recently. And he’s right.

I wonder if Trump is cribbing lines from my book, Con Job: How Democrats Gave Us Crime, Sanctuary Cities, Abortion Profiteering, and Racial Division.

“Black lives don’t matter as much as black votes,” I wrote.

“She’s going to do nothing for African-Americans. She’s going to do nothing for the Hispanics. She’s only going to take care of herself, her husband, her consultants, her donors. These are the people she cares about … She doesn’t care. ”

For blacks to support any Democrat like Hillary Clinton flies in the face of our survival. Democrats peddle the politics of soft bigotry.

My book exposes how Democrats have exploited the black vote for more than 50 years. The liberal media won’t report Hillary and Democrats’ opposition to school choice programs, which help more blacks escape failing schools. Instead, Hillary supports the teachers unions, which protect failing public schools and bad teachers with great pensions.

If elected, Hillary vows to grant amnesty to more than 11 million illegal aliens. This is anathema to the economic prosperity of blacks.

According to a 2010 study, every time immigration increases by 10%, wages for blacks decline by 2.5%.

“Remember this, you’ve had her policies. Democrats — running some of the inner cities for 50, 70, 80 even over 100 years, and look what you have right now — poverty, no education, crime. You can’t walk down the street with your child. We’re going to fix it,” Trump added.

Again Trump is right. In my book, I write about how Baltimore, with a black population over 63%, hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1967. In 2013, the city ranked fifth for murders behind Detroit, New Orleans, Newark and St. Louis — all Democrat controlled cities. And in 2013, the unemployment rate for black men ages 20-24 was 37%.

Speaking of blacks and crime, Hillary really showed she doesn’t care about blacks.

In support of her husband’s 1994 crime bill, Hillary called young black men super predators who needed to be brought to heel like dogs. If this is not a bigot talking, I don’t know what is.

Hillary promises to reform our criminal justice system, instead of working on policy that addresses putting the black family back together again.

About 73% of all black babies today are born out of wedlock. Rather than encouraging black marriage, Hillary supports the welfare system that disproportionately rewards black women for having illegitimate babies.

The more babies black women have, the more free stuff they get from the government nanny. The cycle repeats for generations, helping Democrats own the black vote.

In 2016, Hillary beat Bernie Sanders in the South Carolina primary and other heavily black states like Georgia and Mississippi by pandering to blacks.

Hillary has adopted a black dialect when talking to predominately black audiences. Appearing on a radio show this spring targeted to black Americans, Hillary joked with the black hosts that she loves hot sauce like a lot of black people and carries a bottle in her purse.

There was scant coverage of this by the liberal media, much less calling Hillary a racist. Maybe in voting for a Republican for president, blacks would gain political power to influence policy again. Something they haven’t had since the Civil Rights Movement.

Trump his own worst enemy

First published August 23, 2016 in the Toronto Sun

Who’s in and who’s out with Donald Trump’s campaign seems like a new version of the reality television show “Survivor.”

Less than three months before the 2016 presidential election, Republican nominee Donald Trump reshuffled his team again. Several months ago, Trump dumped campaign manager Corey Lewandowski for Paul Manafort.

Last week, Trump dismissed Paul Manafort, the veteran Republican strategist, who tried to tame Trump, amid negative press about Manafort receiving over $12 million in lobbying payments for pro-Russia leaders in Ukraine.

Trump replaced Manafort with anti-establishment Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway as his new campaign manager and named Breitbart News’ Chairman Stephen Bannon as CEO of his campaign. The problem with this latest staff shuffles is their polarizing nature.

I’m a fan of the ultra-conservative site Breitbart, but naming Bannon with no political experience head of Trump’s campaign won’t put the tattered GOP back together again or lift Trump’s miserable poll numbers.

To quote the New York Times, which I never do, Breitbart called Bill Kristol, the conservative commentator “a renegade Jew” and advised female victims of online harassment “to just log off” and “stop screwing up the Internet for men.”

Conway is just as anti-establishment as Bannon. In her decade of polling experience, Conway has worked for controversial, losing candidates.

In 2010, Conway worked for Tea Party conservative Christine O’Donnell, who lost her bid for the Senate because she talked about “dabbling in witchcraft.” In 2012, Conway worked for Todd Akin, who ran for Senate and lost when he doubted if victims of “legitimate rape” can become pregnant.

It’s questionable whether Trump’s new dream team can attract independent or traditional Democratic supporters like blacks, Hispanics, Asians or women. There’s no doubt he’ll need them to win the White House.

Recently, Trump began asking blacks for their vote, reminding them that their allegiance to the Democratic party over the past 50 years hasn’t been a success.

“What do you have to lose? You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs; 58% of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?” Trump said at a Michigan campaign stop.

In hiring Bannon and Conway, Trump seems headed down the road of a colossal loss — not victory. He seems to want to surround himself with the “the Amen corner” — a choir of yes men and women, instead of staff who can help transform him into a winning presidential candidate.

From the start, I — like many others — admired Trump’s unconventional candidacy and appeal to average Americans outside the marginalizing bubble of the GOP establishment. But now Trump’s incontrovertible behaviour is getting old. After his staff dust up, a new Trump said he “regrets saying the wrong things.”

So maybe he should act like it — not for a day or even a week, but for the remainder of the campaign.

Trump’s pugnacious and pugilistic personality is his own worst enemy — not the liberal mainstream media or his ever-shifting campaign team.

Perhaps if Trump would start acting like he wants to win instead of lose in November, his poll numbers against Hillary would be up by 20%.

The problem with Team Trump is Trump.

Black College Students’ Racist Roommate Ad

First published August 16, 2016 in Frontpage Magazine

Thanks to the Black Lives Matter mob, now it seems to be politically correct and okay for black students to discriminate against white students. Three black students at Claremont Colleges in Southern California posted a “roommate wanted ad” for their off campus house on Facebook

The catch was that only people of color need apply. In parentheses, the ad posted by Kare Urena, noted “POC only,” which meant whites weren’t welcome. When other students complained on Facebook about the post, Urena wrote:

“It’s exclusive I don’t want to live with any white folks.”

Now imagine for a moment if a group of white college students had done the same thing? They would make national headlines non-stop for days, as the liberal media lambasted them as racists. In fact, this did happen when a group of white college students at the Univeristy of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign tried to create a white students union. Students formed the group in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, which they felt was a “terrorist group” that promoted white hate.

The school’s chancellor and the media condemned the Illini White Students Union. According to the group’s original Facebook page, the group was created to promote “White Pride and a safe place for White students.”

When white students want to create safe spaces to express their views, they’re right to free speech is condemned as discrimination, racism and intimidation. But when three black college students decide to advertise for a non-white roommate, liberals say this is their right and warranted in the name of social justice.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Urena, a 20-year old junior and one of her roommates, Sajo Jefferson, a sophomore defended their non-PC ad in a statement.

“We live in a world where the living circumstances of POC are grounded in racist social structures that we can not opt out of. These conditions threaten the minds, bodies and souls of people of color both within and without the realms of higher education. We are fighting to exist.”

I’m struggling to understand what these students are fighting for? Blacks have equal access to the same education as whites. Many would argue that affirmative action policies give blacks an advantage over whites when it comes to getting accepted to colleges.

“There are at least 361 four year colleagues in America that offer degrees in African American Studies, according to Peterson’s, an authoritative website on higher education for parents and students. Based upon my own casual review of multiple schools’ websites, it appears the faculty teaching these programs are overwhelmingly black, about 80 to 90 percent. Each of the nation’s Ivy League schools, where more than 86 percent of the faculty’s campaign donations go to the Democrats, has a department of either African American Studies or Africana Studies, the new lingo for black. In the interest of equality, shouldn’t Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, Princeton, Penn, Dartmouth and Columbia offer “white studies” majors? They don’t because that would be considered racist, but the Democrats in liberal academia are quite comfortable serving up “black studies” to black students,” I wrote in my book Con Job.

Black studies departments are nothing more than a liberal pandering tool for elite colleges to placate black students ever-present racial grievances.

“How many white students do you know who have majored in black studies? The name itself turns any white student away,” I write in my book Con Job.

“The curriculum in these classes is laughable. Perusing the various coursework offerings at the nation’s Ivy Leagues, I couldn’t believe students were earning credits toward degrees for these classes. As you can imagine, the courses are steeped in all things race and racist,” I wrote.

Excuse me if I just can’t see the “racist social structures” these black college students claimed justified their discriminatory housing ad.

But if three white students ran an similar advertisement for a white only roommate, black students would have protested and demanded the college president suspend the students. As one student pointed out in response to the Facebook post, “housing segregation is illegal.” Indeed it is but when it comes to discrimination it appears that black Americans get a free pass in the name of social justice and safe spaces.

Another student noted, “I think that a POC-only housing policy is about as clear-cut an example of prejudice as one could find.”

Me too. Liberals may choose to limit racism to “whites only” but its offenders come in all races–even black.